There is often debate about the
sprint length especially for teams new to scrum. It seems that new scrum teams have a tendency
to gravitate towards a longer sprint length i.e. 4 weeks. The common validation for longer sprints
includes:
- Less pressure on the team when learning a new methodology
- Reducing the overhead of starting/stopping sprints
- The difficulty in delivering functionality in a short (2 week) sprint cycle
Although these may be valid points,
there are many reasons as to why a new scrum team would benefit from a shorter sprint
cycle such as:
- More rapid feedback that keeps everybody engaged and focused
- Increased visibility of progress to all stakeholders
- Less overall risk by exposing issues quicker
- Enables the team to establish their velocity and cadence quicker
- Decreased opportunity to introduce changes into the sprint
- Limits the work in progress
The key to dealing with the inherent
pressures associated with learning a new methodology is ensuring the team has a
good scrum master, scrum coach and scrum training. This will also reduce the sprint planning
overhead and produce user stories sized correctly to be completed in a shorter
sprint cycle. The team will then realize
all the benefits of a shorter sprint cycle with an overall result of delivering
value to the customer more rapidly.
No comments:
Post a Comment